It seems that Gordon Brown thinks that the best way to deal with the expenses row is to just give cash to all MPs, under new proposals MPs will receive a daily payment for just turning up, no receipts, no checks and balances, just cash straight into their pockets; and he call this progress.
Currently the second home allowance is worth a whopping £23,000 a year to an MP, although MP’s do have to provide some receipts to substantiate their claims; the new system that Gordon proposes to replace the second homes allowance will see £170 per day going to MPs, with no need for receipts or any form of evidence of expense incurred, this adds up to a potential additional income of £25,500 a year for every MP. Well done Gordon you have just proposed a huge wage rise for all MPs, and you expect us to believe this is in our best interests.
It is obvious to everyone that the second homes allowance is open to widespread abuse, but changing it for a free cash giveaway is not the answer, but I suppose it is what we have come to expect from our self serving politicians.
I would think that the solution is obvious, MPs need to be re-imbursed for legitimate expenses, these expenses can be easily defined as the cost of accommodation close to Westminster if their normal residence is more than 30 miles from Westminster, this immediately cuts out claims for their main residence and lays down strict limits.
We must end this culture of sleaze where MPs believe it is normal to bend the rules for their own financial gain, so anyone that receives a Grace and Favour residence immediately loses the right to claim the second home allowance.
Expenses are not income, they should not be used to make a profit, so if an MP wants to purchase a second home near Westminster they should be able to claim back only the interest portion of their mortgage, not the full payment on a repayment mortgage, not stamp duty and certainly not legal fees.
If an MP was to rent a furnished apartment near Westminster I would have no problem with that MP being able to claim back that rent up to the current limits, however if that MP decided to purchase an apartment of house then I can see no reason why the taxpayer should be asked to furnish the house or pay for any repairs or renovations.
The rules should be simple, a common sense approach giving MPs a strict set of rules, administered by an independent body, with the guiding principles of fairness to the tax payer and no financial gain to the MP.
Only when we vote people in to office who truly believe in these principles will the system change for the better, these problems exsist not just in the House of Commons but also in the European Parliament, we need real change now, help me to make that change by using your vote in the European Elections and vote for an independent candidate.
none